In search of exolunas, but still a long way to confirm their existence

alien moon
Dive into the fascinating world of cosmic exploration brought to you by the FreeAstroScience team. This article discusses the captivating topic of alien moons, unraveling the mystery of why we have not yet confirmed their existence, despite the abundance of moons in our Solar System. We'll delve into the research methods, algorithms, and technologies that aim to unearth these celestial bodies in the future.




The Elusive Quest for Alien Moons

As it currently stands, the existence of alien moons, also known as exomoons, remains unconfirmed. Recent research suggests that the supposed evidence supporting the presence of two far-off moons orbiting exoplanets beyond our Solar System aligns more closely with alternative interpretations.


Astrophysicist René Heller of the Max Planck Institute for Solar System Research explains that while the initial hope was to verify the presence of exomoons around the exoplanets named Kepler-1625b and Kepler-1708b, the subsequent analysis contradicted this. However, the silver lining is that the same techniques employed in this study hold potential for successful detection in future explorations.


The Intricacies of Exomoon Search

The universe is a vast playground for moons. Within our Solar System alone, the count is nearly 300 and growing, which is a staggering 37 times the number of planets. Given that over 5,550 exoplanets have been confirmed to date, one could infer an astronomical number of potential exomoons. However, the actual discovery is a challenging endeavor. The diminutive size, faintness, and substantial distance of exoplanets already pose a significant obstacle, and these issues are magnified when searching for even smaller and dimmer exomoons.


Exoplanets are primarily identified through the transit method, which hinges on the dimming of a star's light as a planet orbits in front of it. Regular patterns in these light dips often indicate the existence of an extrasolar planet.



The Challenge of Replicating Observations

A 2018 study reported a potential exoluna signal associated with the transit of exoplanet Kepler-1625b. However, subsequent separate analyses in 2019 failed to replicate these findings, indicating the original signal probably wasn't an exoluna. 


A similar situation occurred in 2022 with an alleged exoluna orbiting exoplanet Kepler-1708b. In response to these setbacks, Heller and his peer, astrophysicist Michael Hippke of the Sonneberg Observatory, created Pandora, an algorithm designed to detect and characterize exoplanet transits with exomoons.


Pandora: The Key to Exoluna Detection

The Pandora algorithm was devised by simulating transits for all conceivable sizes, distances, and orbital configurations of exoplanets and their potential exomoons. The data from these simulations was then fed into Pandora. The algorithm's closer examination of Kepler-1708b's data suggested that the supposed exoluna signal could be more accurately attributed to a lone exoplanet.


Hippke stated, "The likelihood of a moon orbiting Kepler-1708b is distinctly lower than previously suggested. Our data doesn't support the existence of an exoluna around Kepler-1708b." 


The team also analyzed Kepler-1625b and discovered that the supposed exoluna effects could be attributed to variations in the wavelengths observed by the Kepler and Hubble telescopes, leading to a false positive. This suggests that the search for an exoluna in our Milky Way galaxy continues, but with Pandora, there's hope.



Exoluna Discoveries: What's Possible with Current Technology?

The research team utilized Pandora to predict the type of exoluna that our current technology could potentially detect. Their findings suggest we should be looking for a large exoluna, almost Earth-sized, with a considerable orbital separation from its host, similar to a planetary binary.


Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post