The Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC), inclusive of the Gulf Stream, is a critical cog in the global climate machine, transporting warm waters from the tropics to the north, and colder waters south. Scientists, however, are cautioning that this system could potentially collapse between 2025 and 2095, leading to a dramatic drop in temperatures, destruction of marine ecosystems, and a surge in global storm events.
Despite the dire predictions, there are those in the scientific community who advise caution, highlighting the potential uncertainties within the new research. The AMOC is believed to operate in two stable states – a stronger, faster mode, which is currently active, and a weaker, slower mode. Previous estimates had projected a shift to this weaker state within the next century.
However, the new study, published in Nature Communications, suggests that anthropogenic climate change could accelerate this shift, pushing the AMOC to a critical tipping point earlier than anticipated. This would then lead to a series of dramatic and potentially catastrophic changes to the global climate.
The AMOC is often likened to a global conveyor belt, circulating vital elements such as oxygen, nutrients, carbon, and heat around the globe. This system has been weakened by climate change, with fresh water from melting ice caps reducing the density and salinity of the water, slowing the flow of the current.
The potential collapse of the AMOC would have a profound impact on global temperatures, particularly in Europe and North America, which could see a temperature drop of up to 9 degrees Fahrenheit. Furthermore, the study also suggests that the system's collapse could commence as early as 2025, underlining the urgent need for climate action.
Controversy over predicted collapse
Oceanographers and climate experts said that while the study provides alarming warning, it has some major uncertainties.
"If the statistics are robust and represent a correct/relevant way of describing how the current modern AMOC behaves, and the changes relate solely to changes in the AMOC, then this is a very worrying result," said David Thornalley, professor of ocean and climate science at University College London. "But there are some really big unknowns and assumptions that need to be investigated before we can have confidence in this result."
Other climate scientists have gone so far as to pour cold water on the results, suggesting that it is "completely unclear" that the observed evolution of AMOC's surface temperature could be related to the strength of its circulation.
"While the math seems expertly done, the physical basis is extremely shaky: it is based on the assumption that the collapse shown by the simplified models correctly describes reality -- but we simply don't know, and there is no serious discussion about the shortcomings of these simplified models," said Jochem Marotzke, professor of climate science and director of the Max Planck Institute for Meteorology in Hamburg. "Thus, while the paper might be a valuable exercise in time series analysis in a peer-reviewed journal, it falls well short of its self-proclaimed goal of estimating circulation evolution solely from observations."
The researchers behind the new study say their next steps will be to update their model with data from the past three years, which should narrow their window for the predicted collapse.
Post a Comment