Debuting in 1998, The Truman Show is an unparalleled Hollywood masterpiece—a satirical, psychological sci-fi comedy-drama—depicting a man dwelling in a reality devised by TV producers. The film significantly impacted its audience at the time, yet its true foresight was yet to be fully grasped. Over the years, The Truman Show has come to symbolize numerous cultural concerns—pervasive surveillance, mass voyeurism, and the relentless rise of reality television.
Crafted by Andrew Niccol and directed by Peter Weir, the movie grossed over $125 million in the United States and approximately $264 million globally, garnering three Oscar nominations for best supporting actor, original screenplay, and director. However, these figures alone fail to capture the extent of its influence.
The prophetic film meticulously follows Truman, an insurance agent, who is entirely unaware that his life is the centerpiece of an international, morally dubious TV show. His loved ones are actors, and his surroundings have been fabricated since birth.
Truman's existence is captured by 5,000 cameras strategically placed throughout the fictitious "hometown" of Seahaven Island, broadcasting his life 24/7 to 1.5 billion devoted viewers.
One fateful day, his fabricated world begins to unravel as a series of unforeseen disruptions unfold, leading Truman to a profound realization.
While Truman courageously chooses to abandon his fabricated "reality" and break free from manipulation, society seems to have collectively embraced the opposite direction. The film's warning has undoubtedly been neglected as media voyeurism has become an increasingly integral part of our lives.
Weir, despite the film's striking and timely relevance, did not anticipate The Truman Show to be so prophetic. "I had no idea that the reality TV tsunami was just below the horizon," he admits. During the film's production, reality television was still emerging, with shows like The Real World pioneering the way. However, it was the Dutch Big Brother format that transformed the genre into a global sensation.
Weir recalls a comment from the creator of Big Brother, who was in the planning stages when the film was released: "When I saw Truman, I thought we'd better get a move on." Big Brother premiered about a year later. The Truman Show's incisive commentary on life under constant surveillance anticipated not only the age of reality television but also the entire social media culture.
The Truman Show appeared all too plausible with the advent of Big Brother, but Weir remarks that during its making, many considered the concept far-fetched: "The problem was that we had to accept that [The Truman Show] had to be watched by a worldwide audience for 30 years, 24 hours a day." Now, such scheduling seems far less implausible, owing to the endless procession of reality shows and live streaming on various social media platforms, where users document lengthy portions of their lives for viewers to consume incessantly.
How real is "reality"?
Weir also hit the nail on the head when it came to the conventions of "unscripted" television, even before these could be described as such. As with all good reality shows, the "reality" of The Truman Show is really spun by the producers who dictate the events of Truman's world. Christof (Ed Harris), the megalomaniacal creator of The Truman Show, has a despotic eye that oversees everything, his power illustrated by his request to "point to the sun!" Encounters with passersby and acquaintances are meticulously rehearsed so that Truman's interactions with the world seem organic. The collective desire to observe a mundane "reality" is outlined by Christof in the film's opening moments.
That ambiguity about what is "real" and what is counterfeit is at the heart of today's elusive media culture, from the Kardashians to Instagram Lives. Just as the public craves reality, that "reality" can be questionable in its authenticity, adulterated with manufacturers' instructions, product placement, social media filters and others. Meanwhile, those who participate in reality TV mostly exhibit a certain level of performativity because of their awareness that the cameras are following them-and this is where they obviously differ from the innocent Truman. Regardless of the participants' complicity or otherwise, however, as with The Truman Show, these shows feed the audience's desire to vicariously experience other people's "real" lives.
Indeed, the layered narrative of the spectacle in The Truman Show film also comes to address the existential and epistemological question of what we understand as "real." It is reminiscent of Plato's allegory of the cave, which describes a situation in which people who have been chained in a cave all their lives see shadows cast on the opposite wall that become "real" to them-even if they are not accurate representations of the real world. The Truman Show can be interpreted as a modern reflection of this idea, as distilled by Christof when he proclaims, "We accept the reality of the world presented to us. It's that simple."
The same could probably be said for 21st century audiences in general; like Truman, we are presented with a reality that in many ways could be understood as orchestrated. Online identities and reality TV are a "truth" created through heavy editing just as Truman's life is heavily contrived. The world Christof has constructed is Truman's truth, Truman's cave, and we too are all in echo chambers and caves of our own truth.
The Truman Show also formulates how life can be lived for the entertainment of others. Now we can all become Truman thanks to widespread access to online platforms. The phenomenon of self-transmission has proliferated in our self-narrativizing society; you can provide an endless stream of soap opera life to an online audience via Twitter, Instagram, Facebook, TikTok and many other social media.
We can all indulge in the much derided Main Character Syndrome, a social media shortcut for those who narcissistically imagine themselves as the protagonists of their own life story, with the people around them as secondary characters.
"I think [the film] makes a valid argument for this sense of growing inability to separate entertainment and reality," film programmer and writer Lilia Pavin-Franks told BBC Culture. "Perhaps audiences have an affinity for reality TV because it gives a sense of relativity, but at the end of the day, reality TV remains entertainment first and foremost."
Pavin-Franks highlights the complicated relationship between viewer and participants at the heart of the story of The Truman Show and reality TV in general. How do the former view the latter-as empathetic subjects, pleasantly manipulated objects, or both? Whatever the nature of the bond, it certainly can be strong: according to a 2016 study by market research agency OnePoll, "nearly 1 in 5 of respondents revealed that they have become attached to a reality star or character, with 1 in 10 admitting to being obsessed with a reality show."
This extracts the idea of a participant perceived as a consumer product: it appears in Weir's film in the way the audience buys Truman's character with Truman-themed merchandise. But there is also something ecstatic in the way they watch it, from their couches, in bars, and even in the bathtub, 24 hours a day-a profound collective experience.
The Truman Show Syndrome
The continuing cultural resonance of the Truman Show can be seen very concretely in the emergence of "Truman Show Syndrome," a term coined in 2008 by psychiatrist Joel Gold and his academic brother Ian Gold to describe patients who believed they were being secretly filmed for the entertainment of others. Ian Gold, Associate Professor of Philosophy and Psychiatry at McGill University, told BBC Culture that although the film "captured a salient moment in the history of technology and resonated with many people's experience," it was not the single cause of the delusion. Instead, the film's impact intersected with increasing surveillance within Western culture. "After 9/11, the Patriot Act made surveillance a salient feature of American culture and beyond."
Thus, it can be assumed that widespread access to cell phones and social media would have only further increased Truman-like anxieties. This is certainly the belief of Dr. Paolo Fusar-Poli, Professor and Chair of Preventive Psychiatry in the Department of Psychosis Studies at King's College London, and co-author of research on the Truman Show Syndrome phenomenon published in the British Journal of Psychiatry in 2008.
Dr. Fusar-Poli told BBC Culture, "Certainly, the recent profound digitization and overexposure of our lives on social media could trigger these [Truman-like] experiences." Professor Gold argues that "cultural realities always intrude into the psychotic experience," and thus the transition to a highly digital life could increase the paranoia surrounding surveillance.
Both Gold and Fusar-Poli talk about the relevance of The Truman Show to modern identity, but Weir also emphasizes the fact that the film is about a more fundamental paranoia, regardless of current cultural trends. When he met with actors auditioning for the film, he reveals, many confided that they identified with Truman because in their youth they had felt like "cheated, [with] everyone around them acting."
Although the rise of reality TV and social media has clearly cemented the film's legacy for the ages, Weir still expresses his surprise at the "enduring" relevance of The Truman Show: "It seems to appeal to a young audience, which is unusual for a film older than they are," he says.
The Truman Show ends with Truman finding an escape route to heaven through an empyrean gateway of darkness, the opposite of the light at the end of the tunnel. However, there is a semblance of hope in the open conclusion-hope that Truman can continue to live his life without the uneasy presence of an omnipresent audience. Truman's example is one that some believe our society as a whole would do well to finally consider.
Post a Comment