Unresolved Discrepancy in Universe's Expansion Rate Persists with Updated Measurements

The enigmatic issue known as the "Hubble tension" has become even more challenging to decipher due to recent findings on the distances to specific stars in our galaxy. Fresh research has enhanced our knowledge of Cepheids, further amplifying the discrepancy in the measurements of the universe's expansion rate.

To comprehend the ever-accelerating expansion of the universe, scientists must determine its velocity, referred to as the Hubble constant (named after Edwin Hubble, who first identified that galaxies were drifting apart due to expansion). This constant is crucial for evaluating theories about the cosmos and demystifying aspects such as dark energy (responsible for expansion), gravity, and space-time. If the Hubble constant is inaccurate, our understanding of the universe may be incomplete.

Two primary methods exist for calculating the universe's expansion rate: one based on Cepheid stars and the other on cosmic microwave background radiation (CMB). The first method yields a constant value of 73 km/s/Mpc, while the second results in 67.4 km/s/Mpc.

Cepheids are stars that serve as benchmarks for measuring cosmic distances. The more luminous these stars are, the longer their brightness variation period. By gauging this period, a Cepheid's intrinsic luminosity can be determined, allowing for precise distance calculations.

Cepheids act as the initial step in a cosmic distance ladder, necessitating an exceptionally accurate calibration of their brightness. Subsequently, they are employed to calibrate the ladder's next step, which involves supernovae.

Led by Richard Anderson at the EPFL Institute of Physics, the Stellar Standard Candles and Distances research group conducted the most precise Cepheid calibration to date, utilizing data from the European Space Agency's (ESA) Gaia satellite. This recalibration of the expansion rate resulted in a value of 73 km/s/Mpc, consistent with previous measurements using Cepheids. The refined Cepheid calibration has made the Hubble tension increasingly difficult to resolve.

Anderson believes that the more accurately their calculations are confirmed, the more likely it is that the discrepancy implies our understanding of the universe is flawed. If the methods, calculations, and measurements are accurate, scientists may eventually have to "reconsider the fundamental concepts that underpin our general understanding of physics," according to Anderson.

The study's findings were published in the journal Astronomy & Astrophysics.

You Might Also Like :