Picture this: you type a few words into a box, hit enter, and thirty seconds later, you're listening to a brand-new song. It sounds like something you'd hear on the radio. The melody is catchy. The production is polished. But here's the uncomfortable question—whose song is it, really?
Welcome to FreeAstroScience, where we break down complex topics into ideas you can actually use. We're glad you're here. Today, we're exploring one of the most contentious battles in modern technology: the collision between artificial intelligence and music copyright. Over just 18 months, we've watched an industry transform from open warfare to uneasy partnership.
If you've ever wondered whether AI will replace musicians, steal their work, or somehow do both at once—stick with us. This story has twists you won't expect.
The Rise of AI Music Generators: Spring 2024
How It All Began
In early 2024, two startups changed everything. Suno AI launched on December 20, 2023, and Udio followed on April 10, 2024 . Both promised the same thing: type a description, get a complete song.
These weren't garage projects. Udio was founded by former Google DeepMind employees and raised $10 million with backing from venture capital giant a16z and artists like will.i.am . Suno, affiliated with Microsoft, released its V3 model—capable of producing radio-quality music in seconds .
Here's where things got complicated fast.
The Copyright Problem Nobody Wanted to Talk About
Both platforms needed training data. Lots of it. And that data came from somewhere—specifically, from existing songs created by real human artists .
The startups called this "democratizing music creation." Critics called it something else entirely: theft.
The Lawsuits Begin: $150,000 Per Song
When the Major Labels Struck Back
In June 2024, the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) dropped a bombshell. Sony Music Entertainment, Universal Music Group, and Warner Records filed lawsuits against both Suno and Udio in federal courts in Boston and New York .
The accusations were severe: copyright violation involving works by artists ranging from Chuck Berry to Mariah Carey. The damages requested? $150,000 per song used without permission .
That's not a typo. Per. Song.
Suno's Stunning Admission
Suno initially defended itself by claiming its technology creates "original material" and doesn't reproduce existing content . But in August 2024, the company made a remarkable admission.
Suno acknowledged it had used "all music files of reasonable quality available on the open internet" to train its model .
Let that sink in. Every song you've streamed, every track uploaded to random corners of the web—potentially fed into an algorithm without anyone's consent.
The Artists Fight Back
Over 50,000 Creatives Sign a Declaration
By late October 2024, the backlash had grown far beyond courtroom battles. The Guardian reported that Thom Yorke of Radiohead and actress Julianne Moore joined over 10,500 creative professionals in signing a declaration against unauthorized AI training .
The list reads like a who's-who of artistic achievement:
- Björn Ulvaeus (ABBA)
- Robert Smith (The Cure)
- Kazuo Ishiguro (Nobel Prize-winning author)
- Kevin Bacon (actor)
- Universal Music Group
- American Federation of Musicians
Today, that declaration has over 50,000 signatures .
The "Double Standard" Argument
Ed Newton-Rex, a composer and former Vice President of Audio at Stability AI, organized the petition and raised a point that still stings.
AI companies invest heavily in engineers and infrastructure. They pay for servers, salaries, and office space. But training data—the copyrighted works of thousands of artists—they treat as a free resource .
Newton-Rex also criticized proposed UK copyright reforms that would allow AI companies to scrape protected content unless artists actively "opt out." His argument: most creators don't even know these procedures exist. He advocates for an "opt-in" system that gives artists real control .
Who Owns What? The Ownership Puzzle
Three Groups, Three Claims
By November 2024, the question of ownership had become a tangled mess. Who actually owns AI-generated music? At least three groups believed they did :
| Claimant | Their Argument |
|---|---|
| Artists & Labels | Their music trained the AI—so the outputs belong to them |
| Users | They wrote the prompts and lyrics—so they're the creators |
| Platforms | They built the technology—so the outputs are theirs |
A Court Weighs In
In March 2025, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia issued a landmark ruling on an AI-generated image case. The decision established that:
- Works created autonomously by AI without human contribution cannot be copyrighted in the United States
- US law recognizes only humans as authors
- Works created by humans with AI assistance may be protected—but no clear standards exist yet
This ruling didn't solve the music problem. If anything, it made things murkier.
The Aha Moment: From Enemies to Partners
Here's where the story takes its most surprising turn.
June 2025: Secret Negotiations
Remember those billion-dollar lawsuits? By June 2025, the same major labels—Universal, Warner, and Sony—were reportedly in negotiations to license their catalogs to Udio and Suno .
You read that correctly. The companies suing these startups were now trying to sell them music.
The proposed deals included something even more interesting: the labels wanted equity stakes in the startups they were suing .
October 2025: A Streaming-Style Model Emerges
According to the Financial Times, Universal and Warner were close to signing agreements with multiple tech companies, including:
- ElevenLabs
- Stability AI
- Suno
- Udio
- YouTube
- Spotify
The proposed model would work like streaming: artists get paid every time their music is used or generated by an algorithm .
The Deals That Changed Everything
Universal Music + Udio: From Courtroom to Partnership
In November 2025, Universal Music announced a partnership with Udio—the same platform it had sued just one year earlier .
The deal includes:
- Legal settlement and compensation
- A hybrid service launching in 2026 combining streaming, creative tools, and social networking
- A closed system where AI creations can't be downloaded or shared externally
- Explicit artist consent required before their music can be used
- Direct economic participation and royalties for participating artists
Warner Music's Double Deal
On November 19, 2025, Warner Music signed with Udio, resolving their legal dispute .
Six days later, on November 25, Warner became the first major label to officially license music to Suno .
Suno announced the deal on their blog with the headline "A New Chapter in Music Creation" .
The agreement brings significant changes:
- Only paying subscribers can download AI-generated music
- There's a cap on downloads with extra costs for more
- New models launch in 2026 to replace existing ones
The goal? Stop the flood of AI-generated tracks currently swamping streaming services .
Who's Still Fighting?
Not everyone has made peace:
- Universal Music remains in litigation with Suno
- Sony Music continues its lawsuits against both Udio and Suno
What This Means for Artists
The Uncomfortable Truth
Here's what keeps us up at night. These deals may protect the major labels, but what about everyone else?
The Music Artists Coalition has raised concerns about several unresolved issues :
- How will lawsuit settlements be distributed to actual artists?
- What are the specific revenue splits?
- How will disputes be handled when songs have multiple authors?
A source inside Universal confirmed the company won't make its entire catalog available for AI training. They described "a very rigorous authorization process" .
The Independent Artist Problem
For independent musicians—those without label backing—the outlook is uncertain at best .
These licensing deals are being negotiated between powerful entities. The terms, attribution standards, and platform access may once again favor dominant players .
Sound familiar? It should. Critics worry this system will replicate exactly what happened with streaming, where most revenue stays concentrated among a tiny percentage of artists .
The Scale and Speed Problem
We need to talk about something that often gets lost in legal debates.
AI can produce music at a pace humans simply can't match . The resources required to build these systems mean only a handful of well-funded companies control the technology. And those companies answer to their investors—not to artists or audiences .
The fear? That replacing human artistic labor with AI represents the triumph of an oligopoly over civil society .
That's strong language. But when you look at who's making these deals and who's being left out, it's hard to argue the point.
Where We Go From Here
Key Timeline Summary
| Date | Event |
|---|---|
| Dec 2023 | Suno AI launches |
| Apr 2024 | Udio launches |
| Jun 2024 | Major labels sue Suno and Udio |
| Aug 2024 | Suno admits to using open internet music for training |
| Oct 2024 | 10,500+ artists sign anti-AI-training declaration |
| Mar 2025 | US court rules: pure AI works can't be copyrighted |
| Jun 2025 | Labels begin licensing negotiations with AI startups |
| Nov 2025 | Universal partners with Udio; Warner signs with both |
| 2026 | New hybrid platforms expected to launch |
Final Thoughts: The Sleep of Reason
We started with a simple question: who owns AI-generated music? After 18 months of lawsuits, declarations, and deals, we still don't have a clear answer.
What we do know is this: musical creativity is being transformed into a service—something negotiated between platforms and powerful players behind closed doors . The real question isn't about technology. It's about values.
Will there still be room for authentic artistic expression in this new order? Will artists—especially independent ones—see fair recognition for their work? Or will we watch another creative industry get swallowed by forces that prioritize scale over soul?
We don't have all the answers. But we believe in asking the questions.
This article was written for you by FreeAstroScience.com, where we explain complex ideas in terms anyone can understand. Our mission is simple: never let your mind go to sleep. Because as the old saying goes, the sleep of reason breeds monsters.
Come back soon. There's always more to learn, and we'll be here when you're ready.
What do you think about AI-generated music? Are these licensing deals a fair solution—or just a new version of the same old problem? The conversation is just beginning.
Post a Comment