My Christmas Wish Isn’t Wrapped—It’s Work



My wish isn’t in a box.

It’s Christmas Day, and the room is loud with paper ripping and that sharp little snap of tape giving up. The air smells like pine needles and sweet oranges, and under the tree, there are dreams with shiny bows… and then there’s my spot, oddly bare.

I’m not saying this to guilt-trip you—God knows you’ve got enough going on. I’m saying it because this is the most honest thing I can offer today, from my wheelchair, with a mug warming my palms and my laptop humming like a small engine: my wish is to bring light to ignorance, to understand ignorance, and to fight it.

And I’m not doing it alone.


A Holiday Room, A Wider World

While people clink glasses and the cutlery makes that familiar winter chatter, I keep thinking about what sits beyond the decorated tree. FREE AstroScience has said it plainly: beyond the glitter and “futile gifts,” there are people suffering through wars, ignorance, hunger, and the climate crisis—right now, not after the holidays.

That sentence doesn’t smell like cinnamon. It smells like cold air when you open the window and remember the world is bigger than your living room.

So when I say my wish is missing, I mean it doesn’t fit under a branch.


Why My Wish Has Sharp Edges

Ignorance isn’t only “not knowing,” and you’ve felt that in your own bones when a conversation turns sour. It can be a posture, a shield, even a habit that squeaks like an old door each time someone tries to open it.

In our own writing at FREE AstroScience, we’ve warned that science is facing a heavy level of skepticism, and that unverified theories and flashy “high-tech” fantasies with no real use still hook a lot of people in developed countries . Worse, that pattern isn’t limited to folks without training; it shows up in professionals who twist or hide real scientific data to prop up unproven claims .

That’s the part that makes my jaw tighten.

Because it tells you something: ignorance can wear a lab coat.



I Need To Say This Up Front

I’m going to simplify complex science in this post so it’s easier to hold in your hands, the same way you’d hold a warm cup on a cold day. If you want the deeper technical layer, I’ll always point you to the sources and the original wording.

For now, I’m aiming for clarity you can feel.

Like a light clicking on in a quiet hallway.


Three Comforting Beliefs That Keep Us Stuck

You’ve probably heard these three ideas said in a friendly tone, over the buzz of a TV or the soft thud of a phone on the table. They sound normal, like background music in a shop, and that’s exactly why they’re dangerous.

The first belief is that ignorance is just a lack of information. That sounds neat, like folded laundry, yet our own analysis points out something uglier: people get captivated by baseless misinformation, imagined innovations with no practical meaning, and apocalyptic predictions built on flawed science—even when information is everywhere .

The second belief is that science is neutral, so scientists don’t need a moral compass. That belief collapses the moment you remember the atomic bomb, genetic engineering, and artificial intelligence—examples used to show that scientific power carries the ability to lift people up or tear them down .

The third belief is that if the truth is available, people will choose it. A recent literature review reported something more human: people often avoid information to regulate emotion and overload, and they sometimes seek painful information for the same reason, just to end the ache of uncertainty .

If those three beliefs feel familiar, don’t panic. Familiarity doesn’t mean you’re foolish—it means you’re human, breathing in a noisy world.

And noise wears you down.


The Opposite Is Realer, And Kinder

Here’s what I’ve learned, and the keyboard under my fingers feels slightly gritty from too many late nights: ignorance often protects someone from emotional pain. That doesn’t excuse lies, and it doesn’t bless propaganda, but it explains why “just show them facts” so often fails.

That same review boils our tug-of-war down to two blunt questions—“Am I able to bear uncertainty?” and “Am I able to bear the truth?” . When you can’t bear uncertainty, you chase information even if it hurts; when you can’t bear the truth, you postpone knowing .

Read that again and listen for the quiet inside it.

It sounds like compassion with boundaries.


My Christmas Story Isn’t A Miracle—It’s A Routine

Let me tell you one real story, not a fairy tale, with the rain tapping the window like impatient fingers. On days like this, someone sends our team a message that starts sweet and confident, the way a scam often does: “I read this new discovery… it proves everything… why won’t scientists admit it?”

The claim is usually dressed up in jargon, and the words have that smooth plastic feel. Our job is boring in the best way: we look for real data, real sourcing, real methods, and whether reputable outlets report the same thing.

That work isn’t optional for us. FREE AstroScience states its daily mission is to publish verified, high-quality scientific information and to publish data from trustworthy sources, with the team working diligently and without prejudice to protect the integrity of good science .

Sometimes the person writes back angry, like a chair scraping hard across the floor. Sometimes they write back days later and say, quietly, “Okay… I didn’t know I needed this.”

That second message is my Christmas gift.

It doesn’t sparkle, but it lasts.


Why Ethics Belongs In The Same Sentence As “Science”

There’s a reason I keep bringing ethics into this, even when it makes the conversation feel heavier than your winter coat. One essay frames it clearly: scientific progress isn’t ethically neutral, and the duty of the scientist goes beyond method and accurate reporting—it includes thinking about consequences and acting as a steward of knowledge .

In the same piece, the author names principles like foresight, integrity, accountability, beneficence, and justice—words that sound formal until you imagine who gets harmed when they’re missing . You can almost hear the room change when you say “justice” out loud, because it’s not abstract; it’s about who gets protected and who gets used.

This is why my wish isn’t “more science content.”

My wish is better science culture.

And the future depends on it.


The Part That Hurts (And Why I’m Still Hopeful)

I’ll be honest with you, and you can hear the heater clicking in the background as if it agrees: some days I’m tired. Not “I need a nap” tired—more like “my chest feels tight when I open the news” tired.

Because the holiday message we shared at FREE AstroScience wasn’t written from a cosy bubble. We reminded everyone that beyond Christmas tables and consumerist pricing, life has real value, and we asked people to open hearts and minds in action, not only in Christmas hypocrisy and not just in words .

That line matters to me because it makes demands of me, too.

It tells me I don’t get to preach from a safe distance.


So What Do We Do With Ignorance?

You don’t beat ignorance by humiliating people. Humiliation makes a sound like a door slamming, and once it slams, good luck getting truth through the crack.

You also don’t beat ignorance by treating it like a cute misunderstanding. Our own analysis warns about a “resurgence of obscurantism” and a retreat into comforting beliefs that resist proven facts, paired with a lack of ethics that needs stricter scrutiny .

So I’m choosing a third way, and it’s slow. It’s asking for receipts, staying calm, and still drawing a clear line between “I don’t know yet” and “I’ll believe anything that flatters me.”

The future doesn’t need more shouting.

It needs more steadiness.


A Small Practice You Can Try Tonight

If your house is full of voices and your phone keeps buzzing like an angry insect, try one small thing before you share the next headline. When you feel that rush—rage, delight, fear—notice it in your body, the way you’d notice cold air on your face when you step outside.

Then ask yourself the two questions the researchers used to explain our information habits: can I bear uncertainty, and can I bear the truth? . That pause doesn’t make you weak; it makes you harder to manipulate.

After that, do one more thing that feels almost old-fashioned: check whether there’s a trustworthy source behind the claim, because FREE AstroScience has committed to publishing verified information from trustworthy sources for a reason . Your attention is a resource, and you don’t owe it to people selling panic.

That’s not a grand gesture.

It’s a daily habit that shapes the next decade.


My “Missing” Wish Is Sitting Right Here

The best part of this wish is that it isn’t mine alone, and you can hear that in the way our team talks—tired laughter, quick corrections, the clack of keys when someone spots a better source. I said earlier that the entire editorial staff will do everything possible to make this wish come true, and I mean it with the plain honesty of a hand on a shoulder.

We’ll keep pushing for clear thinking without cruelty, because our own message said change begins with ourselves, with science . We’ll keep insisting on ethical responsibility in scientific work because science has power that cuts both ways .

And we’ll keep remembering the people outside the glow of the tree—those hit by war, hunger, ignorance, and climate stress—because forgetting them is the easiest lie of the season .

The future won’t be saved by a perfect post.

It’ll be saved by millions of small choices, repeated, even when the wrapping paper is gone and the room goes quiet.

Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post