Is COBOL Still Running Your Money in 2025?

Mainframe-style terminal screenshot showing COBOL procedure division code in red and green text that reverses a string variable on a black background.

How can a programming language born in 1959 still decide whether your ATM withdrawal is approved today? Welcome, dear readers, to FreeAstroScience, where we like to ask awkward questions about technology that everyone uses but almost no one sees. This article was crafted by FreeAstroScience.com only for you, to show how COBOL quietly runs a huge slice of the global economy—and what that means for you, your job, and even your next card payment. Stay with us to the end for a small “aha” moment: once you see COBOL, you will never look at a plastic bank card in the same way again.

What Is COBOL, Really?

How did COBOL start?

COBOL stands for “COmmon Business Oriented Language,” and it was designed from day one for business tasks like payroll, accounting, and inventory. The language first appeared in 1959 and reached an official standard in 1968, which makes it one of the earliest high‑level languages that let programmers write code closer to human language than to raw machine instructions. From the start, COBOL aimed at clarity: long, descriptive names, strong data descriptions, and a structure that managers could at least read, even if they could not write it.

Why was COBOL so business‑focused?

The teams behind COBOL wanted a common language that different hardware vendors and government agencies could share for record keeping and transactions. [web:45] Financial work needs precise decimal arithmetic, large batches of records, and rock‑solid reliability, and COBOL built these needs into the language instead of treating them as add‑ons. That early match between language design and business reality explains a big part of why COBOL systems are still running today, even while newer languages come and go.



Why Do Banks and States Still Trust COBOL?

How big is COBOL’s invisible footprint?

Let’s look at some numbers that feel almost unreal. Industry surveys and mainframe specialists estimate that COBOL handles around 70–80% of global business transactions and more than 3 trillion US dollars in transaction value every single day. Roughly 95% of ATM swipes and 80% of in‑person credit card transactions still touch COBOL code somewhere in the chain. Estimates put active COBOL code at about 220 billion lines worldwide, with around 1.5 billion new lines added each year, and about 90% of Fortune 500 companies still run some COBOL‑based systems.

Here’s a compact view of some key stats:

Metric (2024–2025) Estimated value
Share of global business transactions handled by COBOL 70–80%
Daily transaction volume on COBOL systems > 3 trillion USD
ATM transactions touching COBOL ≈ 95% of swipes
Global COBOL code in production ≈ 220 billion lines
Fortune 500 using COBOL systems ≈ 90% of companies [web:36]
Core banking systems built on COBOL ≈ 43% worldwide

So, when you tap your card for groceries, odds are high that a COBOL program deep in a mainframe checks your balance, locks your account for a moment, and then commits the final result with astonishing reliability.

Why don’t they just rewrite everything?

Many “legacy systems” running COBOL date back decades and sit at the heart of banks, insurance companies, and government agencies. These systems have been patched, audited, and tuned for so long that they now encode not just code, but also law, regulation, and decades of tiny business rules that nobody has fully written down anywhere else. Full rewrites sound clean in theory, yet real‑world attempts have sometimes ended in disaster, like the TSB Bank migration problems in the UK that left customers locked out and cost hundreds of millions of pounds. [web:40]

Modern mainframe vendors and consultants now argue that the smartest path is often to modernize COBOL systems rather than scrap them: keep the battle‑tested core, expose its functions through APIs, and wrap it with newer interfaces and cloud services. Under that glossy mobile app, an “old” COBOL program might still do the final check on your salary deposit, and that is exactly why banks sleep well at night.

What Makes COBOL So Good at Money?

Which language features match financial work?

COBOL was built for large batches of structured records, such as millions of accounts, invoices, or benefit payments. It shines when reading and writing huge sequential files, running overnight jobs, and making sure that every single cent lines up across reports, which explains its ongoing strength in batch processing. The language includes fixed‑point decimal arithmetic that avoids the tiny rounding errors common in floating‑point operations, which is ideal for “penny‑perfect” financial calculations.

To make that idea more concrete, think of a simple percentage formula:

percentage = (COBOL_transactions / all_transactions) × 100

Financial systems care about the exact cents in both the numerator and the denominator, and COBOL’s data types were designed to keep that kind of precision. On top of that, its strong typing and detailed record layouts support data validation, which lowers the risk of mysterious data corruption in critical ledgers.

How has COBOL managed to stay modern?

COBOL did not freeze in the 1960s. Later standards added structured programming features, better control structures, and, in modern versions, support for object‑oriented style, XML, and even more flexible syntax. At the same time, the language kept strong backward compatibility, so many programs written decades ago still compile and run on today’s systems, often with only small adjustments. This slow but steady evolution lets organizations keep trusted business logic while still connecting it to new technologies, from web APIs to cloud integrations.

The “aha” moment here is simple: the boring look of COBOL code hides a living history of business rules that survived every trend in software development. In a strange way, COBOL is less a fossil and more a long‑lived species that adapted just enough to survive while keeping the same skeleton.

Should You Care About COBOL in the Age of AI?

Is COBOL still a good skill to learn?

Many banks, hospitals, and government agencies now face a skills gap: their veteran COBOL developers are retiring, while younger programmers rarely study the language. Communities of practice and online forums often point out that COBOL knowledge remains a valuable niche skill, since critical systems need maintenance, audits, and cautious modernization. [web:52] Some large institutions report tens or hundreds of thousands of COBOL programs in their estates, which signals long‑term demand for people who can read and gently refactor that code.

At the same time, the job is shifting. New tools use AI and domain‑specific models to help parse and refactor COBOL, making it easier to expose old functions as APIs or to map them into newer architectures. So the modern COBOL specialist often works at the meeting point between old and new: part historian, part software engineer, part translator of business rules embedded in old code.

What are the big questions people ask about COBOL?

Some of the most common search questions about COBOL today include “What is COBOL and who still uses it?”, “Why do banks still rely on COBOL?”, and “Is COBOL worth learning in 2025?”. People also ask how to modernize COBOL systems safely, how APIs can sit in front of mainframes, and how cloud platforms can work with old code without breaking it. All of these questions trace back to a single point: our money depends on old software, and we need both respect and caution when touching it.

Conclusion

So, next time you tap your card for a coffee or see your salary land in your account, picture a quiet mainframe somewhere, running lines of COBOL older than your parents—and still doing the job without drama. We wrote this article at FreeAstroScience.com for you, to remind you that the most important technology in your life may not be the newest one, but the one that has proved itself thousands of nights in a row. Keep your curiosity awake; as Goya warned, “the sleep of reason breeds monsters,” and that also applies to the code that moves your money. Come back to FreeAstroScience.com whenever you want another honest look under the hood of the systems that shape your daily life.

References

  1. COBOL (language history, name, and standards) – Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COBOL [web:45]
  2. COBOL usage statistics and transaction volumes – COBOL Agency / COBOLpro reports. https://www.cobolagency.com/blog/cobol-mission-critical-banking-insurance-government-2024 [web:36]
  3. Global business transactions share handled by COBOL – “The Renaissance of COBOL: Why It's Still Critical in 2024.” https://www.pragmaticcoders.com/blog/5-reasons-to-modernize-cobol and related summaries. [web:49][web:50]
  4. “What is COBOL and Who Still Uses It?” – CBT Nuggets overview of modern COBOL usage. https://www.cbtnuggets.com/blog/technology/programming/what-is-cobol-and-who-still-uses-it [web:38]
  5. “What is COBOL? – Definition, Purpose, History & Relevance.” Mainframe tutorial. https://www.mainframemaster.com/tutorials/cobol/what-is-cobol [web:42]
  6. “The role of COBOL in banking infrastructure.” Luxoft. https://www.luxoft.com/blog/why-banks-still-rely-on-cobol-driven-mainframe-systems [web:41]
  7. IBM – “What Is COBOL Modernization?” https://www.ibm.com/think/topics/cobol-modernization [web:53]
  8. “Enabling Communication via APIs for Mainframe Applications.” arXiv preprint. http://arxiv.org/pdf/2408.04230.pdf [web:33]
  9. “XMainframe: A Large Language Model for Mainframe Modernization.” arXiv preprint. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2408.04660.pdf [web:32]
  10. COBOL features and design focus – teaching notes and language modules. https://www.scribd.com/document/421714243/Cobol-Module [web:51]
  11. Community perspectives on COBOL careers and future – “Does COBOL have a future, and is it worth learning?” discussion. https://www.reddit.com/r/cobol/comments/pv3f1y/does_cobol_have_a_future_and_is_it_worth_learning/ [web:52]
  12. User‑provided source: short COBOL overview document (legacy systems and ongoing use). [file:1]

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35

Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post