What if we told you that particles routinely break the universe's most sacred speed limit—and physics hasn't collapsed?
Welcome to FreeAstroScience.com, where we're about to unpack one of quantum mechanics' most mind-bending secrets: quantum tunneling. We've crafted this exploration specifically for you, our curious reader who refuses to accept "that's just how it is" as an answer. Here at FreeAstroScience, we believe in keeping your mind active and engaged—because as the saying goes, the sleep of reason breeds monsters.
Stick with us through this journey. By the end, you'll understand why particles can seemingly travel faster than light, why this doesn't break physics, and what it reveals about the strange quantum world we actually inhabit.
The Ghost Trick That Particles Pull Off
Let's start with something that should be impossible.
Imagine throwing a tennis ball at a solid brick wall. It bounces back, right? Now picture that same ball occasionally passing straight through the wall as if it weren't there. Not breaking through. Not going around. Just... appearing on the other side .
That's quantum tunneling. And it's not science fiction—it's how our universe actually works at the smallest scales.
Back in 1928, physicists Ronald W. Gurney and Edward Condon described this bizarre phenomenon in Nature magazine . They showed how particles like electrons can "slip through the mountain and escape from the valley," as they poetically put it . This wasn't a mathematical quirk or theoretical fantasy. Tunneling explains:
- How radioactive atoms decay
- Why chemical bonds form the way they do
- How hydrogen nuclei overcome their mutual repulsion to fuse in the sun's core, creating the sunlight that warms our planet
Without quantum tunneling, stars wouldn't shine. You wouldn't exist. Neither would we.
The Question That Haunted Physicists for Decades
Here's where things get weird. Really weird.
Scientists naturally wondered: How long does tunneling take? It seems like a straightforward question. But when physicists first attempted to calculate the answer in 1932, they got results that made no sense .
The numbers suggested something impossible. Something that would make Einstein roll over in his grave.
Thomas Hartman, a semiconductor engineer at Texas Instruments, confronted the mathematics head-on in 1962 . His calculations revealed that barriers acted like shortcuts. A particle tunneling through a barrier arrived faster than if the barrier weren't there at all. Even stranger: making the barrier thicker barely increased the tunneling time .
Think about that. A sufficiently thick barrier would let particles hop from one side to the other faster than light traveling the same distance through empty space .
"After the Hartman effect, that's when people started to worry," physicist Aephraim Steinberg recalled .
For good reason. Einstein's theory of relativity made faster-than-light travel seem fundamentally impossible. In 1907, Einstein realized that superluminal communication could create paradoxes where effects precede their causes .
So which is it? Can particles break the speed limit or not?
Why Time Itself Becomes Slippery in Quantum Mechanics
The challenge runs deeper than you might expect. It touches on the very nature of time.
At our everyday scale, calculating travel time is simple:
Classical Travel Time:
t = d / v
where t = time, d = distance, v = velocity
Done. But quantum mechanics says we can't know both distance and speed precisely at the same moment .
Here's the thing: before you observe it, a particle exists as what physicists call a "wave packet"—a bell curve of probabilities representing all its possible locations . The particle isn't hiding somewhere definite within that curve. It genuinely exists in multiple places simultaneously.
Now picture this wave packet rolling toward a barrier like a tsunami. When it hits, the wave splits. Most reflects backward. But a smaller probability peak slips through, continuing forward .
If a particle registers in a detector on the far side, what can we actually say about its journey? Before measurement, it was a two-part probability wave—both reflected and transmitted. It both entered the barrier and didn't .
"You cannot say what time it spends there," explained physicist Igor Litvinyuk, "because it can be simultaneously two places at the same time" .
This creates a profound problem. Objects have properties like mass and position. But they don't carry an intrinsic "time" we can measure directly . As Steinberg put it: "I can ask you, 'What is the position of the baseball?' but it makes no sense to ask, 'What is the time of the baseball?'"
Time isn't something particles possess. We track changes—clock ticks, which are ultimately position changes—and call those intervals "time" .
But there's no clock inside the particle. So what changes should we track?
The Creative Solutions: Attaching Clocks to Particles
Physicists got creative. Really creative.
Starting in the late 1960s, they conceived thought experiments involving "clocks" attached to the particles themselves . If each particle's clock only ticked while inside the barrier, you could read many particles' clocks and average the results.
These ideas remained theoretical for decades. "They were just coming up with crazy ideas of how to measure this time and thought it would never happen," said Ramón Ramos, lead author of a groundbreaking 2020 study .
But science advanced. And the impossible became possible.
The Attoclock Approach
In 2014, Ursula Keller's team at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich pioneered the "attoclock" method . Picture a barrier rotating like clock hands. Electrons tunnel most often when the barrier points to "noon." When they emerge, their exit angle reveals how much time passed .
Keller's group measured 50 attoseconds—expressed mathematically as:
Keller's Measurement:
50 attoseconds = 50 × 10-18 seconds
(50 billionths of a billionth of a second)
In 2019, Litvinyuk's team improved the technique using simpler hydrogen atoms instead of helium. They measured an even shorter time: just two attoseconds .
But critics argued these measurements had a fundamental flaw. Like Hartman's original definition, they couldn't account for particles that had a "head start" .
The Breakthrough: The Larmor Clock Reveals the Truth
Steinberg's group at the University of Toronto pursued a different, more convincing approach .
Many particles possess an intrinsic magnetic property called "spin." Think of it as an arrow. When measured, it always points up or down. But before measurement, it can point any direction. Crucially, when a particle sits in a magnetic field, its spin angle rotates—a phenomenon called "precession" discovered by Irish physicist Joseph Larmor in 1897 .
The Toronto team used this precession as clock hands. Here's how:
| Step | Procedure | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Create barrier using laser beam | Embed magnetic field within the barrier |
| 2 | Prepare rubidium atoms | Align all spins in specific direction |
| 3 | Send particles toward barrier | Allow atoms to drift at controlled speed |
| 4 | Measure transmitted atoms' spins | Check spin angles after tunneling |
| 5 | Calculate average precession | Determine time spent inside barrier |
Individual spin measurements give unhelpful "up" or "down" answers. But measure many atoms, and the collected data reveals how much spins precessed on average while inside the barrier—thus revealing how long atoms typically spent there .
The result? Rubidium atoms spent an average of:
Toronto Team's Measurement:
ttunnel = 0.61 milliseconds
Less time than traveling through empty space!
That's less time than traveling through empty space .
The math indicated that with a sufficiently thick barrier, atoms could tunnel from one side to the other faster than light .
"What they measure is really the tunneling time," confirmed physicist Luiz Manzoni . The scientific community praised this as the most convincing measurement yet .
So... Do Particles Actually Break Einstein's Speed Limit?
Yes and no. Mostly yes. But it's complicated.
In the six decades since Hartman's paper, every precise measurement has confirmed the same shocking result: quantum tunneling robustly exhibits superluminal behavior .
"How is it possible for [a tunneling particle] to travel faster than light?" Litvinyuk asked. "It was purely theoretical until the measurements were made" .
Manzoni tried accounting for relativistic effects (where time slows for fast-moving particles), thinking this would eliminate superluminal speeds. "To our surprise, it was possible to have superluminal tunneling there too," he said. "In fact, the problem was even more drastic in relativistic quantum mechanics" .
But here's the thing: "There's a mystery there, not a paradox," Steinberg emphasized .
Why Physics Hasn't Collapsed: The Statistical Rescue
Einstein worried that faster-than-light signals could create time-travel paradoxes. Imagine two people, Alice and Bob, moving apart at high speed. Because of relativity, their clocks tell different times. If Alice sends a superluminal signal to Bob, who immediately replies superluminally, Bob's response could reach Alice before she sent her original message .
Effect preceding cause. Causality broken.
So why hasn't quantum tunneling destroyed physics?
Most experts agree the answer is statistical. In a September paper in the New Journal of Physics, physicist Eli Pollak and colleagues argued that while tunneling through extremely thick barriers happens very fast, the probability of a tunneling event through such a barrier is extraordinarily low .
We can express this relationship mathematically:
| Barrier Property | Effect on Tunneling | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Thicker Barrier | ↑ Speed of tunneling ↓ Probability |
Faster but rarer |
| Thinner Barrier | ↓ Speed benefit ↑ Probability |
Slower but frequent |
| Free Space (no barrier) | Normal light speed 100% probability |
Always preferred for signaling |
A signaler would always prefer sending information through empty space .
But couldn't you blast tons of particles at an ultra-thick barrier, hoping one makes it through superluminally? Wouldn't one particle be enough to convey your message?
Steinberg argues a single tunneled particle can't convey information. A signal requires detail and structure. Any attempt to send a detailed signal will always be faster through air than through an unreliable barrier .
Think of it like this: tunneling is like winning the lottery. Sure, somebody wins faster-than-light passage. But you can't predict which particle or when. You can't encode a message into something that unpredictable.
The universe's speed limit remains intact—not because particles can't go faster than light, but because we can't control or signal with the ones that do.
What Particles Experience Inside the Mountain
Steinberg's team isn't finished. Their next experiments will probe not just how long particles spend in barriers, but where within barriers they spend that time .
Theoretical calculations predict something surprising:
Predicted Time Distribution in Barrier:
• Entrance region: High concentration of time spent
• Middle region: Very little time spent
• Exit region: High concentration of time spent
"It's kind of surprising and not intuitive at all," noted Ramos
"It's kind of surprising and not intuitive at all," Ramos noted .
By studying many tunneling particles, researchers are painting a vivid picture of what happens "inside the mountain"—something quantum mechanics' pioneers never expected to see a century ago .
Grace Field, who studies tunneling at the University of Cambridge, finds it remarkable: "You're dealing with a single system that's traveling through space. In that way it almost seems weirder than entanglement" .
What This Means for Reality
Steinberg's work drives home a crucial point: "When you see where a particle ends up, that does give you more information about what it was doing before" .
Quantum mechanics has a reputation for being strange and disconnected from reality. But these experiments show that observation doesn't just collapse possibilities into a single outcome. It reveals actual histories. Particles that tunnel genuinely interact with barriers in time. They have experiences, even if those experiences defy our everyday intuitions.
We're learning that quantum weirdness isn't about particles being mysterious or unknowable. It's about accepting that nature operates by profoundly different rules at small scales—rules that seem impossible until we measure them directly.
The Bigger Picture: Why This Matters
You might wonder why we should care about particles spending 0.61 milliseconds in laser barriers.
Here's why: quantum tunneling isn't some exotic laboratory curiosity. It's fundamental to reality. Every star in the sky burns because of it. Every electronic device in your pocket relies on it. Understanding tunneling time helps us:
- Build better quantum computers that leverage tunneling for calculations
- Design more efficient solar cells by controlling electron behavior
- Develop new materials with precisely engineered quantum properties
- Understand the early universe, where quantum effects shaped cosmic evolution
More fundamentally, grappling with tunneling challenges our conception of time, causality, and what's "really" happening before we observe it. These aren't just physics questions. They're philosophical ones about the nature of reality itself.
Come Back for More Mind-Expanding Science
We've journeyed through one of quantum mechanics' strangest phenomena together. Particles can break the speed limit. Time becomes slippery. Causality survives by the skin of its teeth, rescued by probability and statistics.
But here's what makes this truly remarkable: every word you've read describes our actual universe. Not speculation. Not science fiction. Measured, confirmed, experimental reality.
This is what we do at FreeAstroScience.com—we take mind-bending scientific discoveries and explain them in terms you can grasp without a physics PhD. We believe complex ideas should be accessible to everyone. We believe you should never turn off your mind, because staying curious and engaged is what makes us truly human.
The universe is stranger and more wonderful than most people imagine. We're here to show you just how strange and wonderful it really is.
Come back soon. We've got more mysteries to unravel, more "impossible" things to explore, more moments where you'll think, "Wait, reality actually works like that?"
Because trust us—you haven't seen anything yet.
Post a Comment